Dedicated To Mumbai
Home > RTI > Apex Court raps undertrial MPs, MLAs

Apex Court raps undertrial MPs, MLAs

Monday, March 24, 2014

Supreme Court orders criminal charges against undertrail MPs and MLAs to be expedited and completed within a year, writes Gajanan Khergamker

The Supreme Court has, once again, lashed out on Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs). In a recent order, the Apex Court has ensured Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly facing criminal charges can no longer take refuge under the long-drawn criminal trials against them and continue in the office for as long as it takes for the outcome of the trail.

In early March, the Court set a year’s deadline for completing proceedings against such MPs and MLAs after framing of charges. In July 2013, the Supreme Court had ruled a person who is in “lawful custody”, including under-trials as well as those in police or judicial custody, cannot contest elections to the Lok Sabha or state assemblies. The court had then said MPs and MLAs who have been convicted in criminal cases by the trail courts will be disqualified from contesting election. But the order was overruled after passing a bill in the parliament.

SC’s latest aims to clean the political system
The latest order by the Supreme Court seems like a step in the right direction to clean the political system of the country. And, there is a very high possibility that the order might just bring to an end, the lengthy political careers of many of these law makers. Just sometime back, the court had ordered that an MP or an MLA convicted and sentenced to two years or more in jail will automatically be disqualified. The disqualification would continue for further six years after the serving of the sentence.

This time, a bench headed by justice RM Lodha held that trial courts would have to explain to the chief justices of their high courts if proceedings are not completed within a year of framing charges and thereby order day-to-day hearings in such cases. The order said that the chief justice can make the decision of extending the trail period if s/he finds the reason for the delay justifiable.

Undertrial MPs, MLAs continue to hold office
As of now, with proceedings against many of the MPs and MLAs pending for years, these lawmakers enjoy the membership of the legislative bodies despite being charged with heinous offences, the court maintained. “... in cases where MPs and MLAs are involved (in criminal cases) trial should get over soon. If somebody is innocent, let he or she be exonerated soon. You will yourself see a change in performance of the Parliament and assembly,” the court said.
The order came up during a public interest litigation filed by the NGO Public Interest Foundation, asking MPs and MLAs to be banned from elections. The court, however, will continue to hear the PIL.

With the elections coming close, the criminal backgrounds of many MPs and MLAs has become a matter of concern. The official press release by Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR) suggests that around one-third of Legislative Poll candidates have criminal records as of March 2, 2014.

ADR, National Election Watch checked previous records
Of these candidates, 70 are those who have contested Assembly or Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha elections in the past. Reportedly, the ADR and National Election Watch checked the records of these 70 candidates through the affidavits submitted by them during previous elections.

In all, 203 candidates were announced by several parties in the beginning of the month, out of 70 candidates who were examined, 34 had declared a total of 224 criminal cases against themselves in their previous election affidavit.

Among the parties, the Shiv Sena has 12 out of 14 candidates with criminal cases, BJP has 13 out of 32, which comes up to 41 per cent candidates with criminal cases, NCP has eight out of 13 totalling up to 62 per cent candidates with criminal cases and AIADMK has one out of six candidates with criminal cases.

Most candidates had criminal charges
Many of these candidates had declared serious criminal cases against them in the previous affidavit. These candidates include, seven out of 14 candidates from Shiv Sena, five out of 13 candidates of Nationalist Congress Party, seven out of 32 candidates of BJP and one out of six candidates of AIADMK who have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.

A law commission report submitted in the court during the hearing of the PIL filed suggested in the past 10 years since 2004, 18 per cent of the candidates contesting in elections, state or national, have criminal cases pending against them. And, over 5,000 candidates faced serious criminal charges and 1,187 of them have gone on to win elections during 2004-13.

Last year, based on the information amassed by replies to RTI applications filed by the Forum of Good Governance in Andhra Pradesh, it was reported that 83 of the 295 sitting MLAs in the state, back then, had cases pending against them and 54 of them had criminal charges registered against them.

Also, of the 60 MPs from the state, 14 had cases pending against them out of which eight are for criminal offences. Besides, eight of the 90 MLCs had cases pending against them and three of them face criminal charges.

When in July last, the Supreme Court had ordered that a candidate facing criminal charges cannot contest elections it has created quite a stir in political circles.

Back then, the Supreme Court had said a person who is in jail cannot cast his vote and hence s/he is not an “elector” under the Representation of the People Act, and therefore, he is disqualified from contesting elections.

According to Section 62(5) of the Act, titled “Right to vote”, a person shall not vote in an election if s/he is confined in jail or is in the lawful custody of the police.

But the same act also conditions that a person must be an “elector” for a parliamentary or assembly constituency in order to contest an election.

And, since a person in jail cannot vote he is not an elector and therefore cannot context election.

This ruling, however, after being termed ‘erroneous’ was overturned in the Parliament by passing a bill overruling Supreme Court’s judgement.

This time, the Court has ordered to expedite the trail against lawmakers to make for a cleaner political environment.

This will, hopefully, help in clearing the names of those innocent candidates whose cases have been dragging for years now and also punish those candidates who are guilty of charges pressed against them.

That is, if the Parliament does not subvert the process to suit the convenience of its inmates.

With inputs from Prerna Pandey

Readers keen on seeking help on drafting RTI applications may write in to or call Gajanan Khergamker on 022-22841593 for any assistance on RTI or to have their findings / issue featured on this page

No Comments Posted
I recently got married. We have started engaging
Dr. Rajan B. Bhonsle, M.D. (Bom)
Consulting Sex Therapist & Counsellor
Dr. (Mrs.) Minnu R. Bhonsle, Ph.D.
Consulting Psychotherapist & Counsellor
Select Sun sign:
Aries (Mar 21 - Apr 20)
Aries (Mar 21 - Apr 20)You will discuss expansion plans but resolve disputes, if any, amicably. Keep your mind open to suggestions and new offers. You can look forward to gains through your work. Those of you who are in fields of communications or media will be in the limelight. Emotionally you will be feeling much more positive and secure. It will be the charms of your beloved, which keep your spirits high.
- Advertising -
Cybercriminals have hit more than 40 countries wi
Yaduvendra Mathur, Chairman and Managing Director
The year 2016 turned out to be a year of transiti
Read More